- 1. Exact amount for every active ingredient0 ✗
- 2. Standardization percentage stated0 ✗
- 3. Chemical form or strain named0 ✗
- 4. Dose within the trial range0 ✗
- 5. Certificate of analysis is public0 ✗
- 6. Per-serving amounts are complete1 ✓
Pilot scorecard
BIOMA Probiotics
BIOMA scored 1 out of 6 for label disclosure under methodology v1.7, read from the label as captured on 2026-09-07.
Why it scored this way
'Proprietary Probiotic Blend' 29 mg stated as a total only, three organisms undifferentiated.
IXOS xylooligosaccharide declared as 100 mg of corn cob extract with no XOS purity percentage; commercial XOS is sold at graded purities and the 1.4-8 g/d reference range is expressed as XOS, so potency depends on a percentage the label omits. Judgment call — flagged for review, as the criterion's stated examples are herbal marker compounds.
Bifidobacterium breve, lactis and longum named to species only, no strain designations, per methodology v1.6.
XOS 100 mg of extract falls below the 1.4-8 g/d reference range even at 100% purity; tributyrin excluded (no positive-outcome trial identified); probiotics excluded per methodology.
No publicly accessible third-party certificate of analysis located 2026-09-07 (product page, brand site, site-scoped search, retail listing images); recorded as a negative finding, not a claim that none exists.
Serving size 2 vegan capsules and 30 servings per container both stated.
The evidence
Scores are read from the live label, captured by screenshot on the date shown. A score describes what the label discloses. It says nothing about whether the product works, and nothing here was lab-tested.

