- 1. Exact amount for every active ingredient0 ✗
- 2. Standardization percentage stated1 ✓
- 3. Chemical form or strain named1 ✓
- 4. Dose within the trial range0 ✗
- 5. Certificate of analysis is public0 ✗
- 6. Per-serving amounts are complete0 ✗
Head to head
Seed DS-01 Daily Synbiotic vs BIOMA Probiotics
Seed DS-01 Daily Synbiotic discloses more: 2 out of 6 against 1. That is a statement about BIOMA Probiotics's label, not about the product.
Side by side
| Criterion | Seed DS-01 Daily Synbiotic | BIOMA Probiotics | Agreement |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Exact amount for every active ingredient No proprietary blend appears anywhere on the Supplement Facts panel. | 0 ✗ | 0 ✗ | same |
| 2. Standardization percentage stated Wherever potency depends on a percentage, such as % withanolides, the label states it. | 1 ✓ | 0 ✗ | differ |
| 3. Chemical form or strain named “Magnesium glycinate,” not “magnesium.” For probiotics, every organism carries a strain designation. | 1 ✓ | 0 ✗ | differ |
| 4. Dose within the trial range The disclosed dose falls inside the range human trials used for the outcome the product claims. | 0 ✗ | 0 ✗ | same |
| 5. Certificate of analysis is public A third-party certificate is reachable with no email gate and no account. | 0 ✗ | 0 ✗ | same |
| 6. Per-serving amounts are complete Serving size and servings per container are both on the panel. | 0 ✗ | 1 ✓ | differ |
| Disclosure score | 2/6 | 1/6 |
Where they differ
The pair splits on 3 of the six criteria. The reasoning below is the same text that appears on each product page.
Seed DS-01 Daily Synbiotic: MAPP pomegranate extract stated as >40% polyphenolic + phenolic bioactives — an earned point, not the default.
BIOMA Probiotics: IXOS xylooligosaccharide declared as 100 mg of corn cob extract with no XOS purity percentage; commercial XOS is sold at graded purities and the 1.4-8 g/d reference range is expressed as XOS, so potency depends on a percentage the label omits. Judgment call — flagged for review, as the criterion's stated examples are herbal marker compounds.
Seed DS-01 Daily Synbiotic: All 24 organisms carry strain designations (B. longum SD-BB536-JP, L. rhamnosus HRVD113-US, etc.); first product in the pilot to take this point under v1.6.
BIOMA Probiotics: Bifidobacterium breve, lactis and longum named to species only, no strain designations, per methodology v1.6.
Seed DS-01 Daily Synbiotic: Serving size 2 ViaCaps stated but servings per container is absent from the panel.
BIOMA Probiotics: Serving size 2 vegan capsules and 30 servings per container both stated.
Where they agree
Both labels were scored the same way on the remaining 3.
Seed DS-01 Daily Synbiotic: Four probiotic blends disclose blend totals (224/36/36/13 mg) but no per-strain amounts.
BIOMA Probiotics: 'Proprietary Probiotic Blend' 29 mg stated as a total only, three organisms undifferentiated.
Seed DS-01 Daily Synbiotic: Under methodology v1.7. Previously 1, on the DS-01 finished-product trials. Those no longer set the range: they dose a whole multi-ingredient synbiotic, so the GI benefit cannot be attributed to the pomegranate component, and their authors include manufacturer employees while an independent ingredient-level range exists. Scored instead against that independent range — 320-656 mg phenolics — which the label's 400 mg at >40% meets only to a floor of about 160 mg, at or below the dose an independent dose-response trial found null (PMID 27879044). Probiotics excluded per methodology.
BIOMA Probiotics: XOS 100 mg of extract falls below the 1.4-8 g/d reference range even at 100% purity; tributyrin excluded (no positive-outcome trial identified); probiotics excluded per methodology.
Seed DS-01 Daily Synbiotic: No publicly accessible third-party certificate of analysis located 2026-09-07 (product page, brand site, site-scoped search, retail listing images); recorded as a negative finding, not a claim that none exists.
BIOMA Probiotics: No publicly accessible third-party certificate of analysis located 2026-09-07 (product page, brand site, site-scoped search, retail listing images); recorded as a negative finding, not a claim that none exists.
The two scorecards
- 1. Exact amount for every active ingredient0 ✗
- 2. Standardization percentage stated0 ✗
- 3. Chemical form or strain named0 ✗
- 4. Dose within the trial range0 ✗
- 5. Certificate of analysis is public0 ✗
- 6. Per-serving amounts are complete1 ✓
Other comparisons
- Physician's CHOICE Probiotics 60 Billion CFU vs Seed DS-01 Daily Synbiotic (2/6 vs 2/6)
- Seed DS-01 Daily Synbiotic vs Culturelle Pro Strength Probiotics (2/6 vs 3/6)
- Seed DS-01 Daily Synbiotic vs Align Probiotic Pro Formula (2/6 vs 4/6)
- Seed DS-01 Daily Synbiotic vs Ritual Synbiotic+ (2/6 vs 4/6)
- Physician's CHOICE Probiotics 60 Billion CFU vs Culturelle Pro Strength Probiotics (2/6 vs 3/6)
- Culturelle Pro Strength Probiotics vs Align Probiotic Pro Formula (3/6 vs 4/6)
- Florastor Probiotic vs Align Probiotic Pro Formula (5/6 vs 4/6)
- Culturelle Pro Strength Probiotics vs Florastor Probiotic (3/6 vs 5/6)
- Physician's CHOICE Probiotics 60 Billion CFU vs NewRhythm Probiotics 50 Billion CFU (2/6 vs 2/6)
- Nature's Bounty Probiotic Acidophilus vs NOW Supplements Probiotic-10 (3/6 vs 2/6)
- Align Probiotic Pro Formula vs Phillips' Colon Health Daily Probiotic (4/6 vs 2/6)
- Align Probiotic Pro Formula vs Align Probiotic Bloating Relief + Food Digestion (4/6 vs 2/6)
- Culturelle Daily Chewable Probiotics for Kids vs MaryRuth Organics Kids Probiotics (3/6 vs 4/6)
- Culturelle Daily Chewable Probiotics for Kids vs Garden of Life Dr. Formulated Kids+ Probiotics (3/6 vs 1/6)
- Lemme Debloat Digestive & Gut Health Gummies vs Digestive Advantage Probiotic Gummies (2/6 vs 4/6)