Supplement Facts Check

Head to head

Nature's Bounty Probiotic Acidophilus vs NOW Supplements Probiotic-10

Nature's Bounty Probiotic Acidophilus discloses more: 3 out of 6 against 2. That is a statement about NOW Supplements Probiotic-10's label, not about the product.

What this compares. Six yes-or-no questions about what each label discloses, scored under methodology v1.14 from dated screenshots of the two live labels (Nature's Bounty Probiotic Acidophilus captured 2026-09-26, NOW Supplements Probiotic-10 captured 2026-09-27). A higher score means the label tells you more, not that the product works better. Neither product was lab-tested, and nothing here is medical advice or a recommendation to buy either one.

Side by side

CriterionNature's Bounty Probiotic AcidophilusNOW Supplements Probiotic-10Agreement
1. Exact amount for every active ingredient
No proprietary blend appears anywhere on the Supplement Facts panel.
1 ✓0 ✗differ
2. Standardization percentage stated
Wherever potency depends on a percentage, such as % withanolides, the label states it.
1 ✓1 ✓same
3. Chemical form or strain named
“Magnesium glycinate,” not “magnesium.” For probiotics, every organism carries a strain designation.
1 ✓1 ✓same
4. Dose within the trial range
The disclosed dose falls inside the range human trials used for the outcome the product claims.
0 ✗0 ✗same
5. Certificate of analysis is public
A third-party certificate is reachable with no email gate and no account.
0 ✗0 ✗same
6. Per-serving amounts are complete
Serving size and servings per container are both on the panel.
0 ✗0 ✗same
Disclosure score3/62/6

Where they differ

The pair splits on 1 of the six criteria. The reasoning below is the same text that appears on each product page.

1 / 0
1. Exact amount for every active ingredient

Nature's Bounty Probiotic Acidophilus: The single active carries an exact amount, Lactobacillus acidophilus La-14 0.5 mg (100 million CFU). No proprietary blend.

NOW Supplements Probiotic-10: 'Blend of 10 Strains of Probiotic Bacteria (25 Billion CFU)' is declared as a single 160 mg line with no per-strain amount or per-strain CFU split. A proprietary blend by the criterion's test, notwithstanding that every organism is named.

Where they agree

Both labels were scored the same way on the remaining 5.

1 / 1
2. Standardization percentage stated

Nature's Bounty Probiotic Acidophilus: No standardization-dependent ingredient in the formula.

NOW Supplements Probiotic-10: No standardization-dependent ingredient in the formula. The actives are live organisms quantified by strain and CFU rather than by a marker compound, so no percentage is required.

1 / 1
3. Chemical form or strain named

Nature's Bounty Probiotic Acidophilus: Strain designation La-14 is printed, not the species alone.

NOW Supplements Probiotic-10: All ten organisms carry strain designations, La-14, Bl-04, Lp-115, Lc-11, Lr-32, Lpc-37, Bb-18, St-21, Ls-33 and Bl-05. Third product in the sample to take this point.

0 / 0
4. Dose within the trial range

Nature's Bounty Probiotic Acidophilus: Under methodology v1.11: every active in this product is a probiotic, so nothing on the panel can be checked against a trial range. The probiotic exclusion removes the comparison, it does not award the point.

NOW Supplements Probiotic-10: This product satisfies the v1.13 disclosure requirement and still fails on a separate ground. The label states 'This product is formulated to deliver a potency of 25 billion CFU through the Best By date', the first through-expiry guarantee found in the sample, so the delivered dose IS establishable. But the 25 billion is an aggregate across ten strains with no split, and the attribution rule bars a blend total from setting or satisfying a range for any single component. No strain can be compared to its own trial dose. The failure is a disclosure gap on the label, not a units problem in the literature.

0 / 0
5. Certificate of analysis is public

Nature's Bounty Probiotic Acidophilus: No publicly accessible third-party certificate of analysis located 2026-09-26 (product page images, brand and parent-company pages, open web search); recorded as a negative finding, not a claim that none exists.

NOW Supplements Probiotic-10: No publicly accessible third-party certificate of analysis located for this product on 2026-09-27. NOW does operate a public lot-number certificate portal at cofa.nowfoods.com with no email gate or account, which would satisfy the criterion, but it is scoped to NOW's essential oils and does not cover supplements; the sample lot record checked was Peppermint Oil. Listing image 6 presents Intertek GMP certification, which the methodology excludes explicitly as a facility certificate rather than a product one. Recorded as a negative finding, not a claim that none exists.

0 / 0
6. Per-serving amounts are complete

Nature's Bounty Probiotic Acidophilus: Serving size '1 Tablet' is stated but servings per container is absent from the Supplement Facts panel.

NOW Supplements Probiotic-10: Serving size 1 Veg Capsule is stated but servings per container is absent from the Supplement Facts panel, the same failure as Seed DS-01, Culturelle and Nature's Bounty.

The two scorecards

Disclosure Facts
Nature's Bounty Probiotic AcidophilusNature's Bounty · label captured 2026-09-26
Disclosure score3/6
  1. 1. Exact amount for every active ingredient1 ✓
  2. 2. Standardization percentage stated1 ✓
  3. 3. Chemical form or strain named1 ✓
  4. 4. Dose within the trial range0 ✗
  5. 5. Certificate of analysis is public0 ✗
  6. 6. Per-serving amounts are complete0 ✗
Each criterion scores 1 or 0. No weighting, no partial credit.
Why it scored this way →
Disclosure Facts
NOW Supplements Probiotic-10NOW Foods · label captured 2026-09-27
Disclosure score2/6
  1. 1. Exact amount for every active ingredient0 ✗
  2. 2. Standardization percentage stated1 ✓
  3. 3. Chemical form or strain named1 ✓
  4. 4. Dose within the trial range0 ✗
  5. 5. Certificate of analysis is public0 ✗
  6. 6. Per-serving amounts are complete0 ✗
Each criterion scores 1 or 0. No weighting, no partial credit.
Why it scored this way →

Other comparisons

All comparisons →   Both rows in the dataset →